[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061002183749.GO16272@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:37:49 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"Linux-Kernel," <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"J.A. Magall??n" <jamagallon@....com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] move drm to pci_request_irq
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 08:12:29PM +0000, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
>
> + pci_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> +
> DRM_DEBUG("lastclose completed\n");
Not necessary. pci_devs are allocated initialised to 0.
> @@ -132,8 +132,10 @@ static int drm_irq_install(drm_device_t
> if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_IRQ_SHARED))
> sh_flags = IRQF_SHARED;
>
> - ret = request_irq(dev->irq, dev->driver->irq_handler,
> - sh_flags, dev->devname, dev);
> + pci_set_drvdata(dev->pdev, dev);
> +
> + ret = pci_request_irq(dev->pdev, dev->driver->irq_handler,
> + sh_flags, dev->devname);
This seems like the wrong place to be setting the pci_drvdata. It
should probably be done in each driver. But then, requesting the IRQ
should also be done by each driver. You've dragged us into the "wow,
what a mess DRI is" black hole here, I'm afraid.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists