linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] move drm to pci_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061002222625.GK3003@slug>
Date:	Mon, 2 Oct 2006 22:26:25 +0000
From:	Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	"Linux-Kernel," <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"J.A. Magall??n" <jamagallon@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] move drm to pci_request_irq

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:36:38PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Llu, 2006-10-02 am 20:12 +0000, ysgrifennodd Frederik Deweerdt:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This proof-of-concept patch converts the drm driver to use the
> > pci_request_irq() function.
> 
> 0 isn't invalid - it means no IRQ was assigned so wants a different
> message.
> 
I understand, what about:

("No usable irq line was found (got #%d)\n", irqno)

This is generic enough, so that if on some arches a given irq (other
than 0) is invalid, the message still makes sense.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/