[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061002235246.GA27274@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:52:46 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, torvalds@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 04:43:38PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 10/2/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
> >On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:21:09 +0100
> >David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Maintain a per-CPU global "struct pt_regs *" variable which can be used
> >instead
> >> of passing regs around manually through all ~1800 interrupt handlers in
> >the
> >> Linux kernel.
> >>
>
> Nice! I was wanting to do that for a long time...
Yeah! Finally get rid of that from every single fricken USB urb
callback. I have been wanting that gone for a very long time.
> >I think the change is good. But I don't want to maintain this whopper
> >out-of-tree for two months! If we want to do this, we should just smash it
> >in and grit our teeth.
>
> Yes, lets drop it in while we still not reached rc1.
I don't care when it goes it, I have no objection to it at all.
David, thanks a lot for doing this.
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists