[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200610020708.k92788Th007608@harpo.it.uu.se>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:08:08 +0200 (MEST)
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To: akpm@...l.org, rdunlap@...otime.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rossb@...gle.com, sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: + allow-proc-configgz-to-be-built-as-a-module.patch added to -mm tree
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 18:17:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > The patch titled
> > > >
> > > > allow /proc/config.gz to be built as a module
> > > >
> > > > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
...
> Can any of the distro people chime in here? Andrew merged this
> patch to mainline today. Several people had disagreed with merging
> it, but now Andrew says we need more discussion (if or) in order to
> revert it.
Merged into -mm or not, modular /proc/config.gz remains an
utterly redundant kernel feature that user-space doesn't need.
User-space knows how to locate modules for the running kernel,
including the module implementing /proc/config.gz; therefore
it can replace the module file with the corresponding config
data, without loss of functionality.
All that's needed is to standardise the location of the
config file; /lib/modules/`uname -r`/config.gz seems a
reasonable choice.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists