linux-kernel - Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 1/4] Generic container system abstracted from cpusets code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20061002014604.9b43cc24.pj@sgi.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Oct 2006 01:46:04 -0700
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	sekharan@...ibm.com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dev@...ru, mbligh@...gle.com,
	winget@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 1/4] Generic container system
 abstracted from cpusets code

Paul M wrote:
> Anyone have any thoughts on the usefulness/insanity of such an idea?

[multiple hierarchies]  I'd say let's pretend we don't know how to
do them, until we have good reason otherwise.  Having just a single
resource hierarchy simplifies the thinking of these things.  If doing
so fits 90% of the needs, and can be stretched to get most of the
remaining needs, then that simplification is well worth it.  It might
mean that a reasonable number of people can actually understand this
stuff, which is always a nice property.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/