linux-kernel - Re: Maybe it's time to fork the GPL License

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1159780725.31946.1.camel@DustPuppy.LNX.RO>
Date:	Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:18:45 +0300
From:	Dumitru Ciobarcianu <Dumitru.Ciobarcianu@...S.RO>
To:	Marc Perkel <marc@...kel.com>
Cc:	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Maybe it's time to fork the GPL License - create the Linux
	license?

On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 01:55 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Just a thought. Suppose we forked the GPL2 license and created the Linux 
> license? (Or some better name) It's kind of clear the Stallman has his 
> own ajenda and that it's not compatible with the Linux model. So - lets 
> fork it an start a new one.
> 
> The idea of the new license is as follows. It would be backwards 
> compatible with GPL2. It's would eliminate the "or later" clause because 
> we have already seen the potential for abuse there. 


Common misconception. As countless times before stated, there is no "or
later" clause in the licence itself.

-- 
Cioby


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/