linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] Math-emu kills the kernel on Athlon64 X2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20061003094926.0e99d13f.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date:	Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:49:26 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc:	akpm <akpm@...l.org>, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Math-emu kills the kernel on Athlon64 X2

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > 
> > Yes, that works.
> 
> Ok. I'll commit that simple thing, and add a comment on why we're 
> apparently doing the same thing twice (you do need _both_ of those things: 
> the "disable_x86_fxsr" will make sure all other CPU's also get cleared, 
> while the "clear_bit()" will clear it immediately on the boot CPU)
> 
> I'll leave the no387/nofxsr linking alone for now. The main reason to use 
> no387 would seem to be just testing that emulation works at all, and I 
> guess we can just tell people to use the "no387 nofxsr" combination.
> 
> So Randy, with this you can boot all the way into user space, and some FP 
> apps still work too?

My few trivial float and double apps work.
Is there any particular test/workload that you want me to run?

> (Of course, user-space may be buggy and use SSE etc without testing for 
> whether the CPU actually supports it - if the install process has 
> installed some special SSE-version of a library depending on what the CPU 
> claimed at that point, or if somebody uses "cpuid" directly rather than 
> asking the kernel. So there's no way we're going to _guarantee_ that this 
> works in user space, but at least a well-behaved user-space that works on 
> a i486 should hopefully be ok).


---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/