[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061003170345.GE17252@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:03:45 -0700
From: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@....hp.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, jt@....hp.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, hostap@...oo.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 12:00:41PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> Consider that that the normal, MINIMUM waiting period for *removing*
> an interface or functionality is six months. I would argue that this
> means that we should be waiting that long before making
> backwards-incompatible changes to an interface should be at least that
> long.
Wireless Tools with the new API were released in
April. wpa_supplicant with the new API was release May 5th. That makes
it 6 months.
Wireless Tools v28 was included in Gentoo April 11th and in
Debian testing May 27th. wpa_supplicant 0.4.9 was included in Gentoo
May 27th and Debian testing June 10th.
Please consider the facts before assuming.
Jean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists