[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1159905750.1386.215.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 22:02:30 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jim Gettys <jg@...top.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] dynticks core: Fix idle time accounting
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 17:35 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> We could "pump up" the relative counts - if 1 no-hz tick would have been 5ms
> long, increment the count by 5 rather than 1 (for an alledged 1khz tick).
> However, when we do that, we break the property that the sum of the ticks
> in the 'cpu0' line is equal to the number of timer interrupts reported in the
> 'intr' line.
I found a way to fix my thinkos. I put up a queue with all fixes to:
http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/2.6.18-mm3/patch-2.6.18-mm3-hrt-dyntick1.patches.tar.bz2
Can you please verify if it makes your problem go away ?
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists