[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4522E0E0.9020404@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:14:56 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...radead.org, matthew@....cx,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, akpm@...l.org, rdunlap@...otime.net,
gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] add pci_{request,free}_irq take #2
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> +int pci_request_irq(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + irqreturn_t(*handler) (int, void *, struct pt_regs *),
> + unsigned long flags, const char *name)
> +{
> + if (!is_irq_valid(pdev->irq)) {
> + dev_printk(KERN_ERR, &pdev->dev,
> + "No usable irq line was found (got #%d)\n",
> + pdev->irq);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return request_irq(pdev->irq, handler, flags,
> + name ? name : pdev->driver->name,
> + pci_get_drvdata(pdev));
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_request_irq);
> +void pci_free_irq(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + free_irq(pdev->irq, pci_get_drvdata(pdev));
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_free_irq);
ACK these parts
> Index: 2.6.18-mm3/include/linux/interrupt.h
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6.18-mm3.orig/include/linux/interrupt.h
> +++ 2.6.18-mm3/include/linux/interrupt.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,13 @@ struct irqaction {
> struct proc_dir_entry *dir;
> };
>
> +#ifndef ARCH_VALIDATE_PCI_IRQ
> +static inline int is_irq_valid(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + return irq ? 1 : 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* ARCH_VALIDATE_PCI_IRQ */
It's not appropriate to have PCI IRQ stuff in linux/interrupt.h.
This is precisely why I passed 'struct pci_dev *' to a PCI-specific irq
validation function, and prototyped it in linux/pci.h.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists