[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061003154449.daab5dbd.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:44:49 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-aio@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH take2 3/5] dio: formalize bio counters as a dio
reference count
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com> wrote:
> dio: formalize bio counters as a dio reference count
>
> Previously we had two confusing counts of bio progress. 'bio_count' was
> decremented as bios were processed and freed by the dio core. It was used to
> indicate final completion of the dio operation. 'bios_in_flight' reflected how
> many bios were between submit_bio() and bio->end_io. It was used by the sync
> path to decide when to wake up and finish completing bios and was ignored
> by the async path.
>
> This patch collapses the two notions into one notion of a dio reference count.
> bios hold a dio reference when they're between submit_bio and bio->end_io.
>
> Since bios_in_flight was only used in the sync path it is now equivalent
> to dio->refcount - 1 which accounts for direct_io_worker() holding a
> reference for the duration of the operation.
>
> dio_bio_complete() -> finished_one_bio() was called from the sync path after
> finding bios on the list that the bio->end_io function had deposited.
> finished_one_bio() can not drop the dio reference on behalf of these bios now
> because bio->end_io already has. The is_async test in finished_one_bio() meant
> that it never actually did anything other than drop the bio_count for sync
> callers. So we remove its refcount decrement, don't call it from
> dio_bio_complete(), and hoist its call up into the async dio_bio_complete()
> caller after an explicit refcount decrement. It is renamed dio_complete_aio()
> to reflect the remaining work it actually does.
>
> ...
>
> +static int wait_for_more_bios(struct dio *dio)
> +{
> + assert_spin_locked(&dio->bio_lock);
> +
> + return (atomic_read(&dio->refcount) > 1) && (dio->bio_list == NULL);
> +}
This function isn't well-named.
> @@ -1103,7 +1088,11 @@ direct_io_worker(int rw, struct kiocb *i
> }
> if (ret == 0)
> ret = dio->result;
> - finished_one_bio(dio); /* This can free the dio */
> +
> + /* this can free the dio */
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&dio->refcount))
> + dio_complete_aio(dio);
So... how come it's legitimate to touch *dio if it can be freed by now?
(iirc, it's legit, but a comment explaining this oddity is needed).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists