[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1159918200.1386.234.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:30:00 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jim Gettys <jg@...top.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 03/23] GTOD: persistent clock support, i386
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 15:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > - write_seqlock_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags);
> > - jiffies_64 += sleep_length;
> > - write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, flags);
> > touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> In this version of the patch, you no longer remove the
> touch_softlockup_watchdog() call from timer_resume().
>
> But clockevents-drivers-for-i386.patch deletes timer_resume()
> altogether.
>
> Hence we might need to put that re-added touch_softlockup_watchdog() call
> into somewhere else now.
clockevents has is it in the resume path.
static void clockevents_resume_local_events(void *arg)
{
....
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
}
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists