[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061003080202.GM28796@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:02:02 +1000
From: Greg Banks <gnb@....com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 008 of 11] knfsd: Prepare knfsd for support of rsize/wsize of up to 1MB, over TCP.
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:41:43PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> Comments on the below?
Looks ok, except...
> @@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ struct svc_serv {
> struct svc_stat * sv_stats; /* RPC statistics */
> spinlock_t sv_lock;
> unsigned int sv_nrthreads; /* # of server threads */
> - unsigned int sv_bufsz; /* datagram buffer size */
> + unsigned int sv_max_payload; /* datagram payload size */
> + unsigned int sv_max_mesg; /* bufsz + 1 page for overheads */
Presumably the comment should read "max_payload + 1 page..." ?
> @@ -414,9 +415,11 @@ svc_init_buffer(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> int pages;
> int arghi;
>
> - if (size > RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD)
> - size = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD;
> - pages = 2 + (size+ PAGE_SIZE -1) / PAGE_SIZE;
> + if (size > RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD + PAGE_SIZE)
> + size = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD + PAGE_SIZE;
> + pages = size + PAGE_SIZE; /* extra page as we hold both request and reply.
> + * We assume one is at most one page
> + */
Isn't there a divide by PAGE_SIZE missing here? Looks
like we'll be allocating a *lot* of pages ;-)
Greg.
--
Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group.
I don't speak for SGI.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists