[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1159864681.1386.90.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:38:01 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jim Gettys <jg@...top.org>, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/21] high resolution timers / dynamic ticks - V2
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 21:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> These patches make my Vaio run really really slowly. Maybe a quarter of
> the normal speed or lower. Bisection shows that the bug is introduced by
> clockevents-drivers-for-i386.patch+clockevents-drivers-for-i386-fix.patch
>
> With all patches applied, the slowdown happens with
> CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=n and also with CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y &&
> CONFIG_NO_HZ=y. So something got collaterally damaged.
>
> I put various helpful stuff at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/x/
> I uploaded all the patches I was using to
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/x/patches/
That's basically the same set I have here +/- the fixups
> It doesn't seem to be a cpufreq thing: cpuinfo_min_freq=800kHz,
> cpuinfo_max_freq=2GHz and cpuinfo_cur_freq goes up to 2GHz under load.
> Wall time is increasing at one second per second.
I retest on my Vaio.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists