[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061004090906.GA3158@slug>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 09:09:06 +0000
From: Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...radead.org,
matthew@....cx, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, akpm@...l.org,
rdunlap@...otime.net, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] move tg3 to pci_request_irq
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:27:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:38:31 -0400
>
> > As for why the flag may be missing -- PCI MSI interrupts are never
> > shared. However, it won't _hurt_ anything to set the flag needlessly,
> > AFAIK.
>
> That's right.
Just to make sure I understood: does this means that the code at lines
296 and 297 in e1000_main.c can be safely removed?
296 if (adapter->have_msi)
297 flags &= ~IRQF_SHARED;
298 #endif
299 if ((err = request_irq(adapter->pdev->irq, &e1000_intr, flags,
300 netdev->name, netdev)))
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists