linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH take2 0/5] dio: clean up completion phase of direct_io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:12:24 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH take2 0/5] dio: clean up completion phase of direct_io_worker()

On Tue, Oct 03 2006, Zach Brown wrote:
> > I trust a lot of testing was done on blocksize<pagesize filesystems?
> 
> I haven't, no.
> 
> > And did you test direct-io into and out of hugepages?
> 
> No, though..
> 
> > `odread' and `odwrite' from
> > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/ext3-tools.tar.gz can be
> > used to test that.
> 
> .. I'll definitely give those a spin, thanks.
> 
> I'll see if I can get some real resources dedicated to collecting the N
> different piles of tests that are kicking around into something
> coherent.  It'll take a while, but I'm sure I'm not alone in being
> frustrated by this disorganized collaborative works-for-me approach.

fio can do most (all?) of this already, might be a good idea to create a
fio job file that has a proper range of regressions like tests for aio.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/