[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1159962084.25772.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 12:41:24 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc: B.Zolnierkiewicz@...a.pw.edu.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, rmk@....linux.org.uk, gregkh@...e.de,
ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic platform device IDE driver
Ar Mer, 2006-10-04 am 16:45 +0900, ysgrifennodd Paul Mundt:
> This is intended purely for the simple NO_DMA ide_generic case.. nothing
> complicated.
>
> What do people think about this, is there a better way to do this?
drivers/ide is going away over time. I think the concept is nice and
it's sort of reflected in the libata VLB drivers. I think it would be a
very good way to get good platform drivers for libata for the embedded
platforms.
Moving the existing drivers/ide stuff to a new drivers/ide variant is
wasted work however.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists