[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061004084540.af17fee5.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:45:40 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Steve Fox <drfickle@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:42:28 -0500
Steve Fox <drfickle@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:50:31 +0000 (UTC)
> > "Steve Fox" <drfickle@...ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:46:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18/2.6.18-mm2/
> > >
> > > Panic on boot. This machine booted 2.6.18-mm1 fine. em64t machine.
> > >
> > > TCP bic registered
> > > TCP westwood registered
> > > TCP htcp registered
> > > NET: Registered protocol family 1
> > > NET: Registered protocol family 17
> > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffffff RIP:
> > > [<ffffffff8047ef93>] packet_notifier+0x163/0x1a0
> > > PGD 203027 PUD 2b031067 PMD 0
> > > Oops: 0000 [1] SMP
> > > last sysfs file:
> > > CPU 0
> > > Modules linked in:
> > > Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.18-mm2-autokern1 #1
> > > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8047ef93>] [<ffffffff8047ef93>] packet_notifier+0x163/0x1a0
> > > RSP: 0000:ffff810bffcbde90 EFLAGS: 00010286
> > > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff810bff4a1000 RCX: 2222222222222222
> > > RDX: ffff810bff4a1000 RSI: 0000000000000005 RDI: ffffffff8055f5e0
> > > RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: 0000000000007616 R09: 000000000000000e
> > > R10: 0000000000000006 R11: ffffffff803373f0 R12: 0000000000000000
> > > R13: 0000000000000005 R14: ffff810bff4a1000 R15: 0000000000000000
> > > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff805d8000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
> > > CR2: ffffffffffffffff CR3: 0000000000201000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> > > Process swapper (pid: 1, threadinfo ffff810bffcbc000, task ffff810bffcbb510)
> > > Stack: ffff810bff4a1000 ffffffff8055f4c0 0000000000000000 ffff810bffcbdef0
> > > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8042736e 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> > > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8061c68d ffffffff806260f0 ffffffff80207182
> > > Call Trace:
> > > [<ffffffff8042736e>] register_netdevice_notifier+0x3e/0x70
> > > [<ffffffff8061c68d>] packet_init+0x2d/0x53
> > > [<ffffffff80207182>] init+0x162/0x330
> > > [<ffffffff8020a9d8>] child_rip+0xa/0x12
> > > [<ffffffff8033c2a2>] acpi_ds_init_one_object+0x0/0x82
> > > [<ffffffff80207020>] init+0x0/0x330
> > > [<ffffffff8020a9ce>] child_rip+0x0/0x12
> > >
> > >
> > > Code: 48 8b 45 00 0f 18 08 49 83 fd 02 4c 8d 65 f8 0f 84 f8 fe ff
> > > RIP [<ffffffff8047ef93>] packet_notifier+0x163/0x1a0
> > > RSP <ffff810bffcbde90>
> > > CR2: ffffffffffffffff
> > > <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
> > >
> >
> > I'm really struggling to work out what went wrong there. Comparing your
> > miserable 20 bytes of code to my object code makes me think that this:
> >
> > struct packet_sock *po = pkt_sk(sk);
> >
> > returned -1, perhaps in %ebp. But it's all very crude.
> >
> > Perhaps you could compile that kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO, rerun it (the
> > addresses might change) then have a poke around with `gdb vmlinux' (or
> > maybe just addr2line) to work out where it's really oopsing?
> >
> > I don't see much which has changed in that area recently.
>
> Sorry for the delay. I was finally able to perform a bisect on this. It
> turns out the patch that causes this is
> x86_64-mm-re-positioning-the-bss-segment.patch, which seems like a
> strange candidate, but sure enough I can boot to login: right up until
> that patch is applied.
hm, that patch was merged into mainline September 29. Does mainline work?
> P.S. I had to comment usb-hubc-build-fix.patch out of the series file
> because it would not apply cleanly and caused quilt (0.45) to simply
> abort its 'push' operation.
Sorry about that.
If mainline _does_ work then perhaps it's an interaction between that patch
and something else in the -mm2 lineup (and at that point in the bisection,
it'll be one of the git trees or something else in the x86_64 tree). Could
be that the problem remains in -mm3.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists