[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <452422FD.5000406@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 14:09:17 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: vgoyal@...ibm.com
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Reloc Kernel List <fastboot@...ts.osdl.org>, ak@...e.de,
horms@...ge.net.au, lace@...kratochvil.net, magnus.damm@...il.com,
lwang@...hat.com, dzickus@...hat.com, maneesh@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] i386 boot: Add an ELF header to bzImage
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:52:58PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>> memsz will contain the memory required to load the kernel image. And
>>> probably should also include the memory used by kernel in initial boot
>>> up code which is unaccounted and unbounded.
>>>
>> Right, so that's a major project to produce.
>>
>
> Eric is already doing that in his patch. He goes through vmlinux
> headers to determine the memory to load the various segments and then
> also takes into account the memory required by bootmem bitmap (128K)
> and memory consumed by initial page tables (tools/build.c). We can
> audit the code more closely for anything missed and can also include
> some buffer amount to be safe.
>
> The only flip side would be that if down the line somebody changes
> the initial bootup code, he shall have to also acccount it in
> tools/build.c. Having said that, its not frequent that initial bootup
> code changes.
>
No, but it's going to be extremely hard to get this straight unless this
is actually enforced. I suspect there needs to be a check and a message
if this is violated.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists