[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200610051045.46919.dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:45:46 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Markus Wenke <M.Wenke@....de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: to many sockets ?
On Thursday 05 October 2006 10:20, Markus Wenke wrote:
> Eric Dumazet schrieb:
> > Could you post here the result of these commands when your system is
> > using more than 100.000 connections (and before the OOM :) )
>
> Hi,
>
> here the results with 130001 connetions
>
> > cat /proc/meminfo
>
> MemTotal: 3108372 kB
> MemFree: 2114404 kB
> Buffers: 5112 kB
> Cached: 97804 kB
> SwapCached: 0 kB
> Active: 140552 kB
> Inactive: 38948 kB
> HighTotal: 2228160 kB
> HighFree: 2048108 kB
> LowTotal: 880212 kB
> LowFree: 66296 kB
See here ? you have 'only' 880212 kB of LOWMEM, and 66 MB free.
all kernel structures (you can see them in /proc/slabinfo) are lying on this
zone, no matter you add RAM on your machine (more RAM end up in HighMEM zone,
wich is basically unused on your setup)
Since you have a 64bits CPU, your best move would be to use a 64bits kernel
(you can keep all user land in 32bits mode)
With a 64bits kernel, kernel land structures would not be constrained in a
small area, but can use full RAM.
I'm curious you have so many sockets but few entries in route cache...
basically all connections come from few machines ?
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists