linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.18 2/2] mmc: Read mmc v4 EXT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45252B12.9010206@drzeus.cx>
Date:	Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:56:02 +0200
From:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
To:	philipl@...mni.utexas.net
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18 2/2] mmc: Read mmc v4 EXT_CSD

Philip Langdale wrote:
> Pierre,
>
> I will reorganise these patches into a series that detects and sets up
> high-speed support. This is pretty simple. Wide-bus is harder because
> you have to run their weird test pattern and check all the power class
> stuff. Hopefully I'll have that done this week.
>   

Goodie. Have these patches seen any wide spread testing?

> Pierre Ossman wrote:
>   
>> philipl@...rt.org wrote:
>>     
>>> +	list_for_each_entry(card, &host->cards, node) {
>>> +		if (card->state & (MMC_STATE_DEAD|MMC_STATE_PRESENT))
>>> +			continue;
>>>   
>>>       
>> Please use the macros.
>>     
>
> I'm confused: mmc_read_scrs and mmc_read_csds use this exact same
> construction in 2.6.18 and Linus' current tree. Should I be checking
> another tree?
>
>   

Nah, they're also wrong. Patches welcome ;)

Rgds
Pierre

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/