[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0610051219500.6596-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:21:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] error to be returned while suspended
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > If you are talking runtime suspend, you should probably just wake the
> > > > device up on first access.
> > >
> > > Do you really think a device driver should override an explicitely
> > > selected power state?
> >
> > (So we are talking runtime suspend?)
>
> Yes. Otherwise the patch would have been ready two days ago.
> But if I am implenting this, I'll do a full implementation.
>
> > No, I do not know what the right interface is. I started to suspect
> > that drivers should suspend/resume devices automatically, without
> > userland help. Maybe having autosuspend_timeout in sysfs is enough.
>
> If you do this at kernel level, you'll screw up any demon implementing
> a power policy to stay within the budget.
Currently we don't have any userspace APIs for such a daemon to use. The
only existing API is deprecated and will go away soon.
Current thinking is that a driver will suspend its device whenever the
device isn't in use. With usblp, that would be whenever the device file
isn't open. See the example code in usb-skeleton.c.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists