[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061005163347.GD20551@in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:33:47 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
fastboot@...ts.osdl.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Horms <horms@...ge.net.au>, Magnus Damm <magnus@...inux.co.jp>,
Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, Ian.Campbell@...Source.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: kexec broken on x86_64
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:56:51PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> On 10/5/06, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com> wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:28:35PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> Kexec is broken on x86_64 under 2.6.19-rc1.
> >>
> >> Or rather - kexec works ok under 2.6.19-rc1, but something related to
> >> the vmlinux format has probably changed and kexec-tools fails to load
> >> a vmlinux from 2.6.19-rc1.
> >>
> >> Loading bzImage works as usual, but vmlinux does not load properly.
> >>
> >> The kexec binary fails with the following message:
> >>
> >> Overlapping memory segments at 0x351000
> >> sort_segments failed
> >> / #
> >>
> >
> >Hi Magnus,
> >
> >Can you please post the readelf -l output of the vmlinux you are trying
> >to load. That's will give some indication if the segments are really
> >overlapping in vmlinux or is it some processing bug at kexec-tools part.
>
> Elf file type is EXEC (Executable file)
> Entry point 0x100100
> There are 4 program headers, starting at offset 64
>
> Program Headers:
> Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr
> FileSiz MemSiz Flags Align
> LOAD 0x0000000000100000 0xffffffff80100000 0x0000000000100000
> 0x00000000001a4888 0x00000000001a4888 R E 100000
> LOAD 0x00000000002a5000 0xffffffff802a5000 0x00000000002a5000
> 0x000000000008e086 0x00000000000c1504 RWE 100000
> LOAD 0x0000000000400000 0xffffffffff600000 0x00000000002fd000
> 0x0000000000000c08 0x0000000000000c08 RWE 100000
> NOTE 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
> 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 R 8
>
> Section to Segment mapping:
> Segment Sections...
> 00 .text __ex_table .rodata .pci_fixup __ksymtab __ksymtab_gpl
> __ksymtab_unused __ksymtab_strings __param
> 01 .data .data.cacheline_aligned .data.read_mostly
> .data.init_task .data.page_aligned .init.text .init.data .init.setup
> .initcall.init .con_initcall.init .altinstructions
> .altinstr_replacement .exit.text .init.ramfs .bss
> 02 .vsyscall_0 .xtime_lock .vxtime .vgetcpu_mode .sys_tz
> .sysctl_vsyscall .xtime .jiffies .vsyscall_1 .vsyscall_2 .vsyscall_3
> 03
>
Hi Magnus,
I think this got introduced because of Ian Cambell's patch for creating
PT_NOTE headers. Can you please try attached patch. I think it should
fix the issue.
Thanks
Vivek
o A recent change to vmlinux.ld.S file broke kexec as now resulting vmlinux
program headers are overlapping in physical address space.
o Now all the vsyscall related sections are placed after data and after
that mostly init data sections are placed. To avoid physical overlap
among phdrs, there are three possible solutions.
- Place vsyscall sections also in data phdrs instead of user
- move vsyscal sections after init data in bss.
- create another phdrs say data.init and move all the sections
after vsyscall into this new phdr.
o This patch implements the third solution.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
---
arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S~x86_64-physical-addr-space-overlap-in-phdrs-fix arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
--- linux-2.6.19-rc1-1M/arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S~x86_64-physical-addr-space-overlap-in-phdrs-fix 2006-10-05 12:15:00.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc1-1M-root/arch/x86_64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S 2006-10-05 12:15:00.000000000 -0400
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ PHDRS {
text PT_LOAD FLAGS(5); /* R_E */
data PT_LOAD FLAGS(7); /* RWE */
user PT_LOAD FLAGS(7); /* RWE */
+ data.init PT_LOAD FLAGS(7); /* RWE */
note PT_NOTE FLAGS(4); /* R__ */
}
SECTIONS
@@ -131,7 +132,7 @@ SECTIONS
. = ALIGN(8192); /* init_task */
.data.init_task : AT(ADDR(.data.init_task) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
*(.data.init_task)
- } :data
+ }:data.init
. = ALIGN(4096);
.data.page_aligned : AT(ADDR(.data.page_aligned) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists