[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45253A2F.4040400@student.ltu.se>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:00:31 +0200
From: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: ebuddington@...leyan.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-mm1: true/false enum in linux/stddef.h fails glibc-2.4
compile
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:51 -0400, Eric Buddington wrote:
>
>> There is an enum contained in some recent -mm versions of
>> linux/stddef.h which seems to be horking my glibc-2.4 compile:
>>
>> enum {
>> false = 0,
>> true = 1
>> };
>>
>> One way or another (I can't find where), 'true' and 'false' are
>> getting defined to 1 and 0, turning the above into enum { 0=0, 1=1 },
>> which though undeniable is not compilable.
>>
>
> I think you're making the mistake of using kernel headers for
> userspace...... rather than the cleaned up headers.
>
I think so too. glibc-2.4 #includes stdbool.h which have false/true
defined as 0/1.
Richard Knutsson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists