[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160072999.6660.5.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:29:59 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, fche@...hat.com,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] The New and Improved Logdev (now with kprobes!)
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 14:09 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> My problem with using a timestamp, is that I ran logdev on too many archs.
> So I need to have a timestamp that I can get to that is always reliable.
> How does LTTng get the time for different archs? Does it have separate
> code for each arch?
>
I just got done updating a patchset that exposes the clocksources from
generic time to take low level time stamps.. But even without that you
can just call gettimeofday() directly to get a timestamp .
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists