[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061005124601.94ed7194.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:46:01 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
torvalds@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than
passing to IRQ handlers
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:22:07 +0100
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
>
> > These should just use __get_cpu_var().
>
> Done.
>
> > And could we please remove the irq_regs macro?
>
> Done.
>
> > I think the change is good. But I don't want to maintain this whopper
> > out-of-tree for two months! If we want to do this, we should just smash it
> > in and grit our teeth. But I am a bit concerned about the non-x86
> > architectures. I assume they'll continue to compile-and-work?
>
> Well, it seems that IA64 and MIPS don't build as of 2.6.19-rc1 without my
> having to do anything. i386, x86_64, powerpc and frv build for at least one
> configuration each. The other archs I haven't touched, so will definitely
> break.
>
> Can those arch maintainers give me patches?
>
>
> Anyway, I've made a GIT tree with just IRQ my patches in. It can be browsed
> at:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/?p=users/dhowells/irq-2.6.git;a=shortlog
>
> Or pulled from:
>
> git://git.infradead.org/~dhowells/irq-2.6.git
>
> David
>
> ---
> The following changes since commit d223a60106891bfe46febfacf46b20cd8509aaad:
> Linus Torvalds:
> Linux 2.6.19-rc1
>
> are found in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.infradead.org/~dhowells/irq-2.6.git
>
A quick survey of the wreckage:
- Dmitry's input git tree breaks a bit
- five of Greg's USB patches need fixing
- a few random -mm patches need touchups
- The hrtimer+dynticks i386 patch takes rather a hit and will need redoing.
So, not too bad at all. It's a bit rough on the poor old arch maintainers,
but it's pretty simple stuff.
I'd say let's do it...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists