| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0610052236010.6038@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:37:40 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> cc: Dennis Heuer <dh@...ple-media.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: sunifdef instead of unifdef >> However, there are three main reasons why I pledge for sunifdef >> compatibility: >> >> 1. There is a project page and an inviting community >> 2. There is HTML documentation >> 3. They use autotools, which is distributor and administrator-friendly autotools is, in some places, not developer friendly. A V=1 feature like the kernel's makefile system has would be beneficial, as well as the possibility to use PIC-compiled objects for PIE-executables (which currently throws an error on some distros, and requires workarounds, like the *-nolibtool files in pam_mount) >> gcc -O2 -m64 -c -o unifdef.o unifdef.c >> unifdef.c: In function 'main': >> unifdef.c:129: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in >> function 'exit' >> unifdef.c:157: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in >> function 'exit' >> unifdef.c:180: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in >> function 'exit' >> gcc unifdef.o -o unifdef >Patches appreciated - seems a simple #include is missing. #include <stdlib.h> -`J' -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists