[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061005213852.17268.13871.stgit@memento.home.lan>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:38:52 +0200
From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@...oo.it>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 06/14] uml: make UML_SETJMP always safe
From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@...oo.it>
If enable is moved by GCC in a register its value may not be preserved after
coming back there with longjmp(). So, mark it as volatile to prevent this; this
is suggested (it seems) in info gcc, when it talks about -Wuninitialized. I
re-read this and it seems to say something different, but I still believe this
may be needed.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@...oo.it>
---
arch/um/include/longjmp.h | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/um/include/longjmp.h b/arch/um/include/longjmp.h
index e93c6d3..e860bc5 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/longjmp.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/longjmp.h
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ #define UML_LONGJMP(buf, val) do { \
} while(0)
#define UML_SETJMP(buf) ({ \
- int n, enable; \
+ int n; \
+ volatile int enable; \
enable = get_signals(); \
n = setjmp(*buf); \
if(n != 0) \
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists