linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix WARN_ON / WARN_ON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20061005145213.f3eaaf7d.akpm@osdl.org>
Date:	Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:52:13 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	"Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>,
	tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix WARN_ON / WARN_ON_ONCE regression

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:43:01 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > So how's this look?
> >   
> 
> Looks fine to me.  Other than the general question of why WARN_ON* 
> returns a value at all, and if so, does the final unlikely() really do 
> anything.

Herbert had a good-sounding reason for wanting this feature, but afaict he
hasn't proceeded to use it at this stage.  And he's hiding from us ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/