[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160085085.8035.222.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:51:25 -0700
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: "Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix WARN_ON / WARN_ON_ONCE regression
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 14:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Tim and Ananiev report that the recent WARN_ON_ONCE changes cause increased
> cache misses with the tbench workload. Apparently due to the access to the
> newly-added static variable.
>
> Rearrange the code so that we don't touch that variable unless the warning is
> going to trigger.
>
> Also rework the logic so that the static variable starts out at zero, so we
> can move it into bss.
>
> It would seem logical to mark the static variable as __read_mostly too. But
> it would be wrong, because that would put it back into the vmlinux image, and
> the kernel will never read from this variable in normal operation anyway.
> Unless the compiler or hardware go and do some prefetching on us?
>
> For some reason this patch shrinks softirq.o text by 40 bytes.
>
Andrew,
Thanks for the patch. I tested it and it helped fix tbench regression
seen earlier and reduced the cache misses.
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists