linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Cast removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0610050954370.4847@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:00:19 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cast removal


>> > > I'm okay applying this patch it touches the linux-specific
>> > > drivers/acpi/* files only, no ACPICA files.
>> > 
>> > Why?
>> 
>> Why am I okay with it?
>
>No, I meant why not clean up ACPICA too?

I was about to go through the whole kernel base for anti-casting. Sounds 
like a big task, and probably is. I just did not want to do it all at 
once and send a mega-patch. Instead, a per-directory walk seems best to 
me, and granted, "dispatcher events executer hardware namespace" and all 
the other directories under drivers/acpi/ were supposed to be the next 
to be examined for casts.
    Though if you have problems with that because compiling with ugh, 
old or broken, compilers, be my guest. 
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t313918-void-casting.html
"""If your compiler requires a cast, you are using a C++ compiler."""
Is that the case?



	-`J'
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/