[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160133932.1607.68.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:25:32 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, torvalds@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than
passing to IRQ handlers
Ar Iau, 2006-10-05 am 20:52 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jeff Garzik:
> The overwhelming majority of irq handlers don't use the 'irq' argument
> either... the driver-supplied pointer is what drivers use, exclusively,
> to differentiate between different instances.
>
> If we are going to break all the irq handlers, I'd suggest going ahead
> and removing that one too.
NAK to that, it will mess up a lot of older drivers which still use the
irq field and also those who want it to print
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists