linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] LOG2: Implement a general integer log2 facility in the kernel [try #4]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10081.1160145224@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:33:44 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc:	torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] LOG2: Implement a general integer log2 facility in the kernel [try #4] 

Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:

> Why not "def_bool n"?

def_bool?  What's that?  default + bool?  I don't remember seeing any of those
in any of the files I looked in.

> Or indeed, since the default is n, why not just "bool"?

*shrug*

I'd prefer to default all of these in a common place rather than having to
relentlessly duplicate them over all archs.  Is that possible?

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/