[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200610060904.51936.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:04:51 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] error to be returned while suspended
Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2006 04:47 schrieb David Brownell:
> On Thursday 05 October 2006 2:25 pm, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > - the issues of manual & automatic suspend and remote wakeup are orthogonal
> > - there should be a common API for all devices
>
> AFAIK there is no demonstrated need for an API to suspend
> individual devices. Of course there's the question of who
> would _use_ such a thing (some unspecified component, worth
> designing one first), but drivers can use internal runtime
> suspend mechanisms to be in low power modes and hide that
> fact from the rest of the system. That is, activate on
> demand, suspend when idle.
I doubt that a lot. Eg. Again, if I close the lid I may want my USB
network cards be suspended or not and that decision might change several
times a day. It's a policy decision in many cases. And I'd not be happy
with being required to down the interfaces to do so. Suspension should
be as transparent as possible.
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists