[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17703.40127.482493.417591@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 22:25:35 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fixup after irq changes
I wrote:
> You also removed the regs argument from the get_irq functions. That
> is a separate unrelated change, which I would want to think about for
> a bit, because at least at one stage I had a use for that parameter.
I remembered the use I had for it - for interrupt controllers that
want to save away an old cpu priority value or similar. The ones that
need to do that (xics and cell) either don't do it (xics :) or use a
per-cpu array (cell). Also, we call get_irq from an interrupt handler
for cascaded interrupts in some cases. So I have applied your patch
and fixed the rejects.
Thanks,
Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists