lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <45185d249694ae2d0bc3.1160197640@thor.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Date:	Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:07:20 -0400
From:	Josef "Jeff" Sipek <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org,
	hch@...radead.org, viro@....linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH 1 of 23] Unionfs: Documentation

From: Josef "Jeff" Sipek <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>

This patch contains documentation for Unionfs. You will find several files
outlining basic unification concepts and rename semantics.

Signed-off-by: Josef "Jeff" Sipek <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>
Signed-off-by: David Quigley <dquigley@....cs.sunysb.edu>
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>

---

5 files changed, 150 insertions(+)
Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX             |    2 
Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/00-INDEX     |    8 ++
Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/concepts.txt |   68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/rename.txt   |   31 ++++++++++
Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/usage.txt    |   41 ++++++++++++++

diff -r faecb9cc26cd -r 45185d249694 Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX	Thu Oct 05 03:01:00 2006 +0000
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX	Sat Oct 07 00:46:18 2006 -0400
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ udf.txt
 	- info and mount options for the UDF filesystem.
 ufs.txt
 	- info on the ufs filesystem.
+unionfs/
+	- info on the unionfs filesystem
 v9fs.txt
 	- v9fs is a Unix implementation of the Plan 9 9p remote fs protocol.
 vfat.txt
diff -r faecb9cc26cd -r 45185d249694 Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/00-INDEX
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/00-INDEX	Sat Oct 07 00:46:18 2006 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+00-INDEX
+	- this file.
+concepts.txt
+	- A brief introduction of concepts
+rename.txt
+	- Information regarding rename operations
+usage.txt
+	- Usage & known limitations
diff -r faecb9cc26cd -r 45185d249694 Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/concepts.txt
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/concepts.txt	Sat Oct 07 00:46:18 2006 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+This file describes the concepts needed by a namespace unification file system.
+
+Branch Priority:
+================
+
+Each branch is assigned a unique priority - starting from 0 (highest priority).
+No two branches can have the same priority.
+
+
+Branch Mode:
+============
+
+Each branch is assigned a mode - read-write or read-only. This allows
+directories on media mounted read-write to be used in a read-only manner.
+
+
+Whiteouts:
+==========
+
+A whiteout removes a file name from the namespace. Whiteouts are needed when
+one attempts to remove a file on a read-only branch.
+
+Suppose we have a two-branch union, where branch 0 is read-write and branch 1
+is read-only. And a file 'foo' on branch 1:
+
+./b0/
+./b1/
+./b1/foo
+
+The unified view would simply be:
+
+./union/
+./union/foo
+
+Since 'foo' is stored on a read-only branch, it cannot be removed. A whiteout
+is used to remove the name 'foo' from the unified namespace. Again, since
+branch 1 is read-only, the whiteout cannot be created there. So, we try on a
+higher priority (lower numerically) branch. And there we create the whiteout.
+
+./b0/
+./b0/.wh.foo
+./b1/
+./b1/foo
+
+Later, when Unionfs traverses branches (due to lookup or readdir), it eliminate
+'foo' from the namespace (as well as the whiteout itself.)
+
+
+Duplicate Elimination:
+======================
+
+It is possible for files on different branches to have the same name. Unionfs
+then has to select which instance of the file to show to the user. Given the
+fact that each branch has a priority associated with it, the simplest
+solution is to take the instance from the highest priority (lowest numerical
+value) and "hide" the others.
+
+
+Copyup:
+=======
+
+When a change is made to the contents of a file's data or meta-data, they
+have to be stored somewhere. The best way is to create a copy of the
+original file on a branch that is writable, and then redirect the write
+though to this copy. The copy must be made on a higher priority branch so
+that lookup & readdir return this newer "version" of the file rather than
+the original (see duplicate elimination).
+
diff -r faecb9cc26cd -r 45185d249694 Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/rename.txt
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/rename.txt	Sat Oct 07 00:46:18 2006 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+Rename is a complex beast. The following table shows which rename(2) operations
+should succeed and which should fail.
+
+o: success
+E: error (either unionfs or vfs)
+X: EXDEV
+
+none = file does not exist
+file = file is a file
+dir  = file is a empty directory
+child= file is a non-empty directory
+wh   = file is a directory containing only whiteouts; this makes it logically
+		empty
+
+                      none    file    dir     child   wh
+file                  o       o       E       E       E
+dir                   o       E       o       E       o
+child                 X       E       X       E       X
+wh                    o       E       o       E       o
+
+
+Renaming directories:
+=====================
+
+Whenever a empty (either physically or logically) directory is being renamed,
+the following sequence of events should take place:
+
+1) Remove whiteouts from both source and destination directory
+2) Rename source to destination
+3) Make destination opaque to prevent anything under it from showing up
+
diff -r faecb9cc26cd -r 45185d249694 Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/usage.txt
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/usage.txt	Sat Oct 07 00:46:18 2006 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+Unionfs is a stackable unification file system, which can appear to merge the
+contents of several directories (branches), while keeping their physical
+content separate. Unionfs is useful for unified source tree management, merged
+contents of split CD-ROM, merged separate software package directories, data
+grids, and more. Unionfs allows any mix of read-only and read-write branches,
+as well as insertion and deletion of branches anywhere in the fan-out. To
+maintain unix semantics, Unionfs handles elimination of duplicates,
+partial-error conditions, and more.
+
+mount -t unionfs -o branch-option[,union-options[,...]] none MOUNTPOINT
+
+The available branch-option for the mount command is:
+
+dirs=branch[=ro|=rw][:...]
+specifies a separated list of which directories compose the union.  Directories
+that come earlier in the list have a higher precedence than those which come
+later. Additionally, read-only or read-write permissions of the branch can be
+specified by appending =ro or =rw (default) to each directory.
+
+Syntax:
+dirs=/branch1[=ro|=rw]:/branch2[=ro|=rw]:...:/branchN[=ro|=rw]
+
+Example:
+dirs=/writable_branch=rw:/read-only_branch=ro
+
+
+KNOWN ISSUES:
+=============
+
+The NFS server returns -EACCES for read-only exports, instead of -EROFS.  This
+means we can't reliably detect a read-only NFS export.
+
+Modifying a Unionfs branch directly, while the union is mounted is currently
+unsupported.  Any such change can cause Unionfs to oops, however it could even
+RESULT IN DATA LOSS.
+
+The PPC module loading algorithm has an O(N^2) loop, so it takes a while to
+load the Unionfs module, because we have lots of symbols.
+
+Unionfs shouldn't use lookup_one_len on the underlying fs as it confuses NFS.
+


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ