[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160320043.3000.178.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:07:23 +0200
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...l.org, johnstul@...ibm.com,
mingo@...e.hu, zippel@...ux-m68k.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + clocksource-initialize-list-value.patch added to -mm tree
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 07:42 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 11:50 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:53 -0700, akpm@...l.org wrote:
> > > A change to clocksource initialization. It's optional for new clocksources,
> > > but prefered. If the list field is initialized it allows clocksource_register
> > > to complete faster since it doesn't have the scan the list of clocks doing
> > > strcmp on each.
> >
> > Either make it required or not.
>
> This is for compatability with all those clocksources people are writing
> that just haven't been released (assuming they will be eventually
> released). I would love to make this required.
so do it. The ones that are in development are easily fixed and
consistency is worth a LOT in terms of API. Bonus points if the kernel
printk's a helpful message on abuse.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists