[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45285CEA.1070104@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 12:05:30 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] mm: fault vs invalidate/truncate race fix
Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 15:06:21 +0200 (CEST)
>Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:
>
>
>>Fix the race between invalidate_inode_pages and do_no_page.
>>
>
>- In do_no_page() there's a `goto retry' where we appear to have
> forgotten to (conditionally) unlock the page.
>
Hmm, the retry should be gone - it was only there for the
seqlock-ish truncate race code.
>- In do_no_page() the COW-break code seem to have forgotten to
> (conditionally) unlock the page which it just COWed?
>
It keeps the 'nopage_page' around and unlocks it at the end.
Last time I looked, this is required because truncate wants to
unmap 'even_cows', so we must hold the pagecache page locked
while instantiating the mapping on the cow page.
>- In do_no_page(), the unlock_page() which _is_ there doesn't test
> VM_CAN_INVALIDATE before deciding to unlock the page.
>
It does a conditional lock if !VM_CAN_INVALIDATE based on a
suggestion from Hugh. I don't disagree with that, but it can
go away in the next patch as we won't be calling into
->page_mkwrite (if that callback can be implemented with ->fault).
--
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists