[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160328400.3693.100.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 10:26:40 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: akpm@...l.org, johnstul@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
zippel@...ux-m68k.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + clocksource-add-generic-sched_clock.patch added to -mm tree
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 18:54 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 09:27 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 18:19 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > > Probably. Anyway, can we just keep the stuff in clocksource.c right
> > > now ?
> >
> > I suppose I can move the sched_clock stuff.
>
> And keep the code you wanted to move into timer.c too.
I'm not moving the kernel/timer.c clocksource user back into
kernel/time/clocksource.c . That code completely belongs with the
generic time of day changes. The code is directly coupled, and in fact
it improves the timekeeping clock switching code to have it that way.
I'd be happy to create kernel/time/timeofday.c though .
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists