linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061008182210.GP30283@lug-owl.de>
Date:	Sun, 8 Oct 2006 20:22:10 +0200
From:	Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)

On Sun, 2006-10-08 20:15:46 +0200, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 08:04:37PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-10-08 19:59:08 +0200, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote:
> > > > Read the bug report: Seems it
> > > > was actually caused by a non-initialized variable introduced by a
> > > > patch to util-linux.
> > > 
> > > It was the sum of two independent bugs, and one of them was a kernel bug.
> > 
> > Without reading the sources but only the bug report, my impression is
> > that the kernel code is correct.
> 
> It seems you missed Comment #1 when reading the bug report?

Indeed. I'm sorry.

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@...-owl.de              +49-172-7608481
  Signature of:                        Lauf nicht vor Deinem Glück davon:
  the second  :                             Es könnte hinter Dir stehen!

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)