[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160343099.3693.153.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 14:31:38 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: akpm@...l.org, johnstul@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
zippel@...ux-m68k.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm
tree
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 23:20 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 14:15 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > >
> > > Which one exactly? I'm not aware of a problem with the existing code at
> > > all.
> >
> > Clock shuffling.
>
> What's the problem with that ? It replaces clocks. Where _is_ the
> problem ?
The problem is that it's not optimal to have clocks switching furiously.
This is something John notes as an issue in the unchanged
kernel/time/clocksource.c file.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists