linux-kernel - Re: [linux-usb-devel] error to be returned while suspended

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200610080840.59432.oliver@neukum.org>
Date:	Sun, 8 Oct 2006 08:40:59 +0200
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] error to be returned while suspended

Am Sonntag, 8. Oktober 2006 02:03 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 07 October 2006 10:16 am, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> 
> > > > I dare say that the commonest scenario involving USB is a laptop with
> > > > an input device attached. Input devices are for practical purposes always
> > > > opened. A simple resume upon open and suspend upon close is useless.
> 
> That is, the standard model is useless?  I think you've made
> a few strange leaps of logic there ... care to fill in those
> gaps and explain just _why_ that standard model is "useless"???

If a device is always opened, as mice are, it will not be suspended.
Yet they can be without any data to deliver forever.

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/