linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020610080045s6d2d1b06o6fc78bfb8fbf4d77@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 8 Oct 2006 10:45:50 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	"Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)

Hi Trond,

On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 01:05:48AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > In any case, what the fuck gives you the right to appoint yourself judge
> > and jury over kernel regressions?

On 10/8/06, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote:
> I've given this right myself - everyone can always send any bug list he
> wants to linux-kernel.

I don't see what the problem here is. As stated in the bug report, a
patch signed off by you broke something in the kernel which is not yet
fixed in -git. Aside from calling people "guilty", what Adrian is
doing is a service to us all.

                                               Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/