linux-kernel - Re: sunifdef instead of unifdef

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200610090158.k991wZZu017745@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:58:34 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Tony Finch <dot@...at.at>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Dennis Heuer <dh@...ple-media.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sunifdef instead of unifdef

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:05:04 BST, Tony Finch said:

> already in serious trouble: for example, my unifdef was written so that I
> could understand xterm's frightening pty handling....)

Well, that code *does* warn you:

* If you think you know what all of this code is doing, you are
* probably very mistaken.  There be serious and nasty dragons here.

:)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped