[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160395876.10229.37.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 22:11:16 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] mm: fault handler to replace nopage and populate
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 14:09 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 01:58:36PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > > > > It also needs update_mmu_cache() I suppose.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hmm, but it might not be called from a pagefault. Can we get away
> > > > > > with not calling it? Or is it required by some architectures?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think some architectures might be upset if it's not called...
> > > >
> > > > But would any get upset if it is called from !pagefault path?
> > >
> > > Probably not... the PTE has been filled so it should be safe, but then,
> > > I don't know the details of what non-ppc archs do with that callback.
>
> I guess we can make the rule that it only be called from the ->fault
> handler anyway. If they want that functionality from ->mmap, then they
> can use remap_pfn_range, because it isn't so performance critical.
Yup. The whole point of the discussion is for cases where we can't just
setup a static mapping at mmap time.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists