[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0610091416290.4279@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 14:20:26 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, torvalds@...l.org,
akpm@...l.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] LOG2: Implement a general integer log2 facility in
the kernel [try #4]
>> > > > Were you planning on porting Linux to a machine with
>> > > > non-8-bit-bytes any
>> > > > time soon? Because there's a lot more to fix than this.
>> > >
>> > > I am considering the case [assuming 8-bit-byte machines] where
>> > > sizeof(u32) is not 4. Though I suppose GCC will probably make a
>> > > 32-bit
>> > > type up if the hardware does not know one.
>> >
>> > If the machine has 8-bit bytes, how can sizeof(u32) be anything other
>> > than 4?
>>
>> typedef unsigned int u32;
>>
>> Though this should not be seen in the linux kernel.
>
> Well, uhh, actually...
>
> All presently-supported architectures do exactly that. Well, some do:
>
> typedef unsigned int __u32;
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> typedef __u32 u32;
> #endif
Ouch ouch ouch. It should better be
typedef uint32_t __u32;
So that even if there happens to be a compiler that does sizeof(int)=8,
sizeof(u32) will actually be 4. Say, if there happens to be an
architecture that does only know 64-bit integers, the compiler will
have some extra magic to make uint32_t behave like a 32-bit type in C
and transparently use 64-bit assembler. So far the theory.
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists