[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200610090856.09776.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 08:56:08 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] error to be returned while suspended
On Saturday 07 October 2006 11:40 pm, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 8. Oktober 2006 02:03 schrieben Sie:
> > On Saturday 07 October 2006 10:16 am, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >
> > > > > I dare say that the commonest scenario involving USB is a laptop with
> > > > > an input device attached. Input devices are for practical purposes always
> > > > > opened. A simple resume upon open and suspend upon close is useless.
> >
> > That is, the standard model is useless? I think you've made
> > a few strange leaps of logic there ... care to fill in those
> > gaps and explain just _why_ that standard model is "useless"???
>
> If a device is always opened, as mice are, it will not be suspended.
Of course it wiill be suspended, as part of system-wide suspend.
That's the standard model.
> Yet they can be without any data to deliver forever.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists