[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <452A77ED.6070001@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 02:25:17 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Try to avoid a pessimistic vmalloc() recursion
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> __vmalloc_area_node() is a litle bit pessimist when allocating space for
> storing struct page pointers.
>
> When allocating more than 4 MB on ia32, or 2 MB on x86_64,
> __vmalloc_area_node() has to allocate more than PAGE_SIZE bytes to store
> pointers to page structs. This means that two TLB translations are needed to
> access data.
>
> This patch tries a kmalloc() call, then only if this first attempt failed, a
> vmalloc() is performed. (Later, at vfree() time we chose kfree() or vfree()
> with a test on flags & VM_VPAGES : no change is needed)
>
> Most of the time, the first kmalloc() should be OK, so we reduce TLB usage.
But this is only TLB usage when managing (read: freeing) the vmalloc pages,
isn't it? Not when actually accessing the data.
I'd be inclined to NACK this, unless you can show an improvement somewhere:
it is suboptimal to even _try_ allocating higher order pages.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists