[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160391014.10229.16.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:50:14 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] mm: fault handler to replace nopage and populate
> The truncate logic can't be duplicated because it works on struct pages.
>
> What sounds best, if you use nopfn, is to do your own internal
> synchronisation against your unmap call. Obviously you can't because you
> have no ->nopfn_done call with which to drop locks ;)
>
> So, hmm yes I have a good idea for how fault() could take over ->nopfn as
> well: just return NULL, set the fault type to VM_FAULT_MINOR, and have
> the ->fault handler install the pte. It will require a new helper along
> the lines of vm_insert_page.
>
> I'll code that up in my next patchset.
Which is exactly what I was proposing in my other mail :)
Read it, you'll understnad my point about the truncate logic... I
sometimes want to return struct page (when the mapping is pointing to
backup memory) or map it directly to hardware.
In the later case, with an appropriate helper, I can definitely do my
own locking. In the former case, I return struct page's and need the
truncate logic.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists