[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1160484135.6177.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:42:15 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: ptrace and pfn mappings
> I think the best idea is to add a new ->access method to the vm_operations
> that's called by access_process_vm() when it exists and VM_IO or VM_PFNMAP
> are set. ->access would take the required object locks and copy out the
> data manually. This should work both for spufs and drm.
Another option is to have access_process_vm() lookup the PTE and lock it
while copying the data from the page.
something like
- lookup pte & lock
- check if pte still present
- copy data to temp kernel buffer
- unlock pte
- copy data to user buffer
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists